Preview

Systemic Hypertension

Advanced search

Regulatory adaptive status in determining the effectiveness of nebivololum and sotalolum in patients with hypertensive disease and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Abstract

Objective. Compare the effectiveness of treatment with nebivololum or sotalolum in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) on a background of essential hypertension (EH) taking into account quantitative evaluation of the regulatory adaptive status (RAS). Materials and methods. 49 patients with paroxysmal SVT against the background of EH of stages II-III took part in the research, they were randomized into two groups for treatment with nebivololum (7.4±1.9 mg/day n=25) or sotalolum (162.5±46.2 mg/day n=24). As part of combination therapy, patients were administered lisinoprilum (14.4±4.4 and 14.3±4.7 mg/day), when required also atorvastatinum (15.9±4.1 mg/day, n=9 and 16.0±4.8 mg/day, n=10), acetylsalicylic acid (93.1±16.2 mg/day, n=14 и 94.1±16.5 mg/day, n=14). Initially and 6 months after therapy, the following was done: quantitative assessment of RAS (by cardio-respiratory synchronism test), echocardiography, triplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries, treadmill test, six-minute walk test, all-day monitoring of blood pressure and electrocardiogram, subjective assessment of quality of life. Results. Both drug regimens comparably improved structural and functional condition of the heart, controlled arterial hypertension, effectively suppressed paroxysms of SVT, improved the quality of life. At the same time, the use of nebivololum increased the RAS and increased exercise tolerance to a greater degree than the use of sotalolum. Conclusion. In patients with paroxysmal SVT against the background of EH of stages II-III, the use of nebivololum as part of combination therapy may be preferable to sotalolum due to its positive impact on the RAS.

About the Authors

N. M. Nazhalkina
Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


V. G. Tregubov
Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


V. M. Pokrovsky
Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Almendral J, Castellanos E, Ortiz M. Update: Arrhythmias (V). Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and preexcitation syndromes. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2012; 65 (5): 456-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.11.026

2. Camm C.F, James C.A, Tichnell C, Murray B. Prevalence of atrial arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10 (11): 1661-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.08.032.

3. Miyamoto K.J, Tsuchihashi K, Uno K. et al. Studies on the prevalence of complicated atrial arrhythmias, flutter, and fibrillation in patients with reciprocating supraventricular tachycardia before and after successful catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001; 24 (6): 969-78.

4. Vanoli E.L, Dei Cas, Willenheimer R. Sudden death prevention in heart failure: The case of CIBIS III. Heart Int 2006; 2 (2): 73. DOI: 10.4081/hi.2006.73

5. Packer M, Coats A.J, Fowler M.B et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 344 (22): 1651-8.

6. Тарасов А.В. Вопросы безопасности антиаритмической терапии. Consilium Medicum. 2014; 16 (10): 44-9.

7. Покровский В.М. Альтернативный взгляд на механизм формирования ритма сердца. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2003; 12 (1): 18-24. DOI: 10.1046/j.1444-2892.2003.00192.x

8. Ломакин А.И., Шнайдер Н.А., Садыкова А.В., Стручков П.В. Актуальные вопросы функциональной диагностики. Медицина экстремальных ситуаций. 2011; 4 (38): 111-8. / Lomakin A.I., Shnaider N.A., Sadykova A.V., Struchkov P.V. Aktual'nye voprosy funktsional'noi diagnostiki. Meditsina ekstremal'nykh situatsii. 2011; 4 (38): 111-8. [in Russian]

9. Покровский В.М. Сердечно-дыхательный синхронизм в оценке регуляторно-адаптивных возможностей организма. Краснодар: Кубань-Книга, 2010.

10. Канорский С.Г., Трегубов В.Г., Покровский В.М. Преимущества терапии квинаприлом у пациентов с артериальной гипертензией и хронической сердечной недостаточностью I-II функционального класса и сохраненной фракцией выброса левого желудочка. Кардиология. 2012; 52 (4): 31-8

11. Трегубов В.Г., Кумачева Е.С., Спирина К.С. и др. Ивабрадин в комплексной терапии хронической сердечной недостаточности III функционального класса. Кубанский научный медицинский вестн. 2010; 8: 184-8.

12. Трегубов В.Г., Покровский В.М., Канорский С.Г. Количественная оценка регуляторно-адаптивного статуса в определении тяжести хронической сердечной недостаточности. Клин. медицина. 2012; 90 (8): 32-5.

13. Трегубов В.Г., Канорский С.Г., Покровский В.М. Регуляторно-адаптивный статус в оценке риска осложнений при хронической сердечной недостаточности. Кубанский научный медицинский вестн. 2012; 3: 172-9.

14. Sule S.S, Frishman W. Nebivolol: new therapy update. Cardiol 2006; 14 (5): 259-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.crd.0000223651.03023.8e

15. Шубик Ю.В., Чирейкин Л.В. Соталол в лечении аритмий. Вестн. аритмологии. 1998; 10: 80-3.


Review

For citations:


Nazhalkina N.M., Tregubov V.G., Pokrovsky V.M. Regulatory adaptive status in determining the effectiveness of nebivololum and sotalolum in patients with hypertensive disease and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Systemic Hypertension. 2017;14(4):20-26.

Views: 128


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2075-082X (Print)
ISSN 2542-2189 (Online)