Preview

Systemic Hypertension

Advanced search

Stress-induced arterial hypertension: search for predictors

https://doi.org/10.38109/2075-082X-2024-2-5-13

Abstract

   Background. Despite the existence of a clear cause-and-effect relationship between job strain and hypertension, there are still no clear criteria for defining stress-induced arterial hypertension (SIAH).

   Objective. Search for SIAH criteria, in particular predictors of hypertension in the workplace.

   Materials and methods. The study included volunteers experiencing stress in the workplace and not having hypertension. Before the start of the working day and at the end of the working day, the subject was surveyed, given questionnaires (Ch. D. Spielberg scale, Montgomery-Asberg MADRS scale, A. M. Vein scale, hospital anxiety and depression scale HADS), blood pressure and resting heart rate were measured, fasting blood was taken to determine the values of ACTH, TSH, T4, insulin, cortisol. All patients underwent ABPM on a working day and a day off.

   Results. According to ABPM (n=52), no signs of masked hypertension were detected, however, significant differences between workdays and weekends in the levels of maximum SBP and DBP during the daytime were noteworthy. In the group with maximum SBP>140 mm Hg during the daytime (SIAH, n = 34), on a workday there was an increase in the time index for SBP>30% (24 hours and day), characteristic of hypertension, and for DBP (24 hours and day), characteristic of borderline (possible) hypertension, the average DBP values during the day and at night were at the upper limit of the norm, which was significantly different from the Normotonic group (n = 19). On a weekday, the SIAH group also had significantly increased SBP (24 hours, day) and DBP (24 hours, day and night) indexes versus Normotonic. For all other indicators except ABPM, the groups were comparable.

   Conclusions. Taking into account the increase in the time index for SBP and DBP, it can be assumed that, against the background of stressful situations at the workplace, the subjects had short frequent increases in blood pressure, which have not yet led to a significant violation of self-regulation of blood pressure and the development of hypertension. An increase in the maximum values of systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure against the background of an increased time index on a working day are possible predictors of SIAH, in particular hypertension at the workplace.

About the Authors

L. G. Ambatiello
E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of cardiology
Russian Federation

Lali G. Ambatiello, Cand. Of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher

Hypertension Department

121552; St. Academician Chazova, 15 a; Moscow

tel. +7(495)414-66-02



A. I. Bravaya
E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of cardiology
Russian Federation

Alexandra I. Bravaya, Resident

Hypertension Department

121552; St. Academician Chazova, 15 a; Moscow



A. N. Rogoza
E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of cardiology
Russian Federation

Anatoly N. Rogoza,  Dr. Of Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Head of Department

Department the New Diagnostic Methods

121552; St. Academician Chazova, 15 a; Moscow



I. E. Chazova
E.I. Chazov National Medical Research Center of cardiology
Russian Federation

Irina E. Chazova, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Dr. Of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department, Deputy Director general for Scientific and Expert Work

Hypertension Department

121552; St. Academician Chazova, 15 a; Moscow



References

1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W et al 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

2. Singh A, Collins B, Gupta A et al. Cardiovascular risk and statin eligibility of young adults after an MI: Partners YOUNG-MI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(3):292-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.007

3. Stress and pathology. Methodical development for independent work of students of medical and pediatric faculties. Ed. prof. Poryadina G.V. M.: RGMU; 2009. (In Russ.).

4. Bobrie G, Clersonb P, Me´nardc J et al. Masked hypertension : a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2008,26:1715-25. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fbcedf

5. O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G et al. Guidelines European Society of Hypertension Position Paper on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertension. 2013;31:1731-68. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328363e964

6. Pickering TG, Coats A, Mallion JM, et al. Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task force V: White-coat hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 1999;4(6):333-41. doi: 10.1097/00126097-199912000-00006

7. Pickerihg TG, Eguchi K, Kario K. Masked hypertension : a review. Hypertens Res. 2007; 30:479-88. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.479

8. Baguet J, Levy P, Tamisier R et al. Masked hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Sleep Меdicine. 2006;7:67. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2006.07.161

9. Parati G, Stergiou G, O’Brien E et al. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1359–1366. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000221

10. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M et al. Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2006;47:846–853. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000215363.69793.bb

11. Mancia G, Zanchetti A. White-coat hypertension: misnomers, misconceptions and misunderstandings. What should we do next? J Hypertens. 1996;14:1049–1052. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199609000-00001

12. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Cuspidi C et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with white-coat hypertension: pro side of the argument. Hypertension. 2017;70:668–675. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.08903

13. Nadinloyi K B, Sadeghi H, Hajloo. Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employees Mental Health. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013;84:293–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.554

14. Rosenthal T, Alter A. Occupational stress and hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2012;6:2–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.09.002

15. Ostroumova OD, Kochetkov AI. Worksite hypertension as a model of stress-induced arterial hypertension. Therapeutic archive. 2018;9:123-132. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/terarkh2018909123-132 doi: 10.26442/terarkh2018909123-132

16. Chazova IE, Zhernakova YuV et al. Clinical guidelines. Diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension. Systemic Hypertension. 2019;16(1):6-31. (in Russian). doi: 10.26442/2075082X.2019.1.190179

17. Guide to cardiology in four volumes. Volume 3: Diseases of the cardiovascular system. Ed. Acad. Chazova EI. M.: Practice; 2014. (In Russ.).

18. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA et al. Longitudinal Study of Job Strain and Ambulatory Blood Pressure. Results from a three-year follow-up. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1998;60(6):697-706

19. Landsbergis PA, Schnall PL, Pickering TG et al. Life-course exposure to job strain and ambulatory blood pressure in men. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(11):998-1006. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg095

20. Ratova LG, Chazova IE. Stress-induced arterial hypertension – clinical features and treatment options. Systemic hypertension. 2012;9(4):50-53. (in Russ.).

21. Anikina EA, Balabina NM. Prevalence, risk factors and clinical course of vegetative dysfunction syndrome. Siberian Medical Journal. 2011;102(3):23-27. (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Ambatiello L.G., Bravaya A.I., Rogoza A.N., Chazova I.E. Stress-induced arterial hypertension: search for predictors. Systemic Hypertension. 2024;21(3):5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38109/2075-082X-2024-2-5-13

Views: 222


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2075-082X (Print)
ISSN 2542-2189 (Online)