Preview

Systemic Hypertension

Advanced search

Results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy depending on different levels of pulmonary vascular resistance and angiographic index of the pulmonary artery lesion

https://doi.org/10.26442/2075082X.2020.1.200040

Abstract

Objective. Pulmonary endarterectomy is a first-choice treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Data describing the results of the operation with different levels of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) depending on the spread and percentage of pulmonary artery disease are not declared in the world literature. The aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the hospital results of the operation in patients with different levels of pulmonary vascular resistance, depending on the CT-angiographic index of the pulmonary artery lesion.

Materials and methods. A retro-prospective study was conducted, which included 52 patients. All patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on the levels of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR): group 1 included 31 patients with PVR<1000 dyne×s/cm5, group 2 – 21 patients with PVR>1000 dyne×s/cm5. Data of the preoperative right heart catheterization in groups 1 and 2, respectively: mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) – 44.4±8.3 and 56.9±9.6 mm Hg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure – 7.3±2.4 and 6±1.5 mm. Hg, cardiac output (CO) – 3.9±0.9 and 3.2±0.6 l/min, cardiac index (CI) – 2±0.5 and 1.6±0.4 l/min/m2, PVR – 767±174 and 1272.6±186.4 dyn×sec/cm5. The operation was carried out bilaterally according to a standard protocol with cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest.

Results. Data of the right heart catheterization on the first day after the operation in first and second groups, respectively: mPAP – 28.5±6.3 and 35.78±4.2 mm Hg, PVR – 253.39±85.5 and 333.9±101.9 dyne×s/cm5, CO – 5.37±0.9 and 5, 2±1.1 l/min, CI – 2.69±0.39 and 2.6±0.4 l/min/m2. There was a significant decrease of pulmonary hypertension (p<0.05) in the early postoperative period, in both groups. However, a detailed analysis of the obtained data revealed that in patients with pulmonary vascular resistance of more than 1000 dyne×s/cm5 with a pulmonary artery lesion index of less than 50%, a significant course of the early postoperative period along the combined endpoint was observed. The intensive care unit stay was 4 days in average in both groups. The need for a tracheostomy for the prolongation of artificial ventilation of the lungs was in 2 and 1 cases in first and second groups, respectively. In the first group, there were 5 cases of transient neurological disorders, which regressed at the time of discharge. Two patients in the second group died.

Conclusion. Despite the varying levels of baseline PVR, a significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters is observed in the early postoperative period, although patients in group 2 were less proven to normalization of pulmonary hemodynamics. However, a detailed comparative analysis revealed that the most severe category of patients are patients with PVR>1000 dyne×s/cm5, with pulmonary artery lesion index of less than 50%. Thus, the calculation of the CT-angiographic index of pulmonary artery diseases an additional diagnostic method to rate the risks of surgery, especially in patients with a high level of preoperative pulmonary hypertension

About the Authors

V. V. Gazizov
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Vilnur V. Gazizov

cardiovascular surgeon



K. V. Mershin
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Kirill V. Mershin

Cand. Sci. (Med.)



E. A. Tabak’yan
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Evgenii A. Tabak’yan

Cand. Sci. (Med.)



S. A. Partigulov
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Stanislav A. Partigulov

D. Sci. (Med.)



Z. S. Valieva
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Zarina S. Valieva

Cand. Sci. (Med.)



T. V. Martynyuk
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Tamila V. Martynyuk

D. Sci. (Med.)



R. S. Akchurin
Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology of National Medical Research Center for Cardiology
Russian Federation
Renat S. Akchurin

Prof., Acad. RAS



References

1. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 903–75.

2. Delcroix M, Lang I, Pepke-Zaba J. Long-term outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation 2016; 133: 859–71.

3. Madani MM, Auger WR, Pretorius V et al. Pulmonary endarterectomy: recent changes in a single institution’s experience of more than 2,700 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94: 97–103.

4. Kawashima T, Yoshitake A, Kawakami T et al. Two-stage Treatment Using Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Pulmonary Endarterectomy in a Patient with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 49: 315.e5–315.e7.

5. Shimura N, Kataoka M, Inami T et al. Additional percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty for residual or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy. Int J Cardiol 2015; 183: 138–42.

6. Wiedenroth CB, Liebetrau C, Breithecker A et al. Combined pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35 (5): 591–6.

7. Wilkens H, Konstantinides S, Lang IM et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): Updated Recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018. Int J Cardiol 2018.

8. Hartz RS, Byrne JG, Levitsky S et al. Predictors of mortality in pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1255–60.

9. Tscholl D, Langer F, Wendler O et al. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy – risk factors for early survival and hemodynamic improvement. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2001; 19: 771–6.

10. Bergin CJ, Sirlin C, Deutsch R et al. Predictors of patient response to pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Am J Respir 2000; 174: 509–15.

11. Mershin K.V., Akchurin R.S. Khronicheskaia tromboembolicheskaia legochnaia gipertenziia. V kn.: Legochnaia gipertenziia. Pod red. I.E. Chazovoi, T.V. Martyniuk. M.: Praktika, 2015; s. 563–602 (in Russian).

12. Chazova I.E., Martyniuk T.V., Filippov E.V. i dr. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii po diagnostike i lecheniiu khronicheskoi tromboembolicheskoi legochnoi gipertenzii (II chast’). Therapeutic Archive. 2016; 88 (10): 63–73 (in Russian).

13. Hsieh WC, Jansa P, Huang WC et al. Residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy: A meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018 [Epub ahead of print].

14. Pepke-Zaba J, Delcroix M, Lang I et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation 2011; 124: 1973–81.

15. Lang IM, Pesavento R, Bonderman D et al. Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a current understanding. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 462–8.


Review

For citations:


Gazizov V.V., Mershin K.V., Tabak’yan E.A., Partigulov S.A., Valieva Z.S., Martynyuk T.V., Akchurin R.S. Results of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy depending on different levels of pulmonary vascular resistance and angiographic index of the pulmonary artery lesion. Systemic Hypertension. 2020;17(1):62-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26442/2075082X.2020.1.200040

Views: 10

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2075-082X (Print)
ISSN 2542-2189 (Online)