The recommendations review concerning the maintenance of patients with arterial hypertension: evidence and expert opinions
Abstract
The article presents the comparison study of 4 English-language recommendations of professional communities during 2013 year concerning the methods used for formulating recommendations; blood pressure levels - BP (primary, threshold and target); the group of primary agents and the treatment regimens.Conclusions. Different methods for formulating recommendations and the use of expert opinions in the absence of the evidences can lead to certain differences in the recommendations. It is not enough being agreed upon the questions concerning the primary and target BP level in elderly patients, the use of b-blockers as the group of primary agents, nowadays and the recommendations show the different treatment regimens.
About the Authors
I. V. Samorodskaya
The National Research Centre for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. A. Boitsov
The National Research Centre for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertension 2013; 31: 1281-357.
2. An Effective Approach to High Blood Pressure Control: American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63 (12): 1230-8.
3. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension in the Community A Statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertension 2014; 32 (1): 3-15.
4. Evidence-Based Guideline for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults Report From the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284427 Published online December 18, 2013.
5. Martin S, Boucher M, Wright J.M, Saini V. Mild hypertension in people at low risk. BMJ 2014; 349: g5432.
6. Tricoci P, Allen J.M, Kramer J et al. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA 2009; 301: 831-41.
7. Андреева Н.С., Реброва О.Ю., Зорин Н.А. и др. Системы оценки достоверности научных доказательств и убедительности рекомендаций: сравнительная характеристика и перспективы унификации. Медицинские технологии: оценка и выбор. 2012; 4: 10-24.
8. Самородская И.В. Смогут ли доказательства влиять на формирование стандартов оказания медицинской помощи? Проблемы стандартизации в здравоохранении. 2007; 2: 22-35.
9. Lenzer J. Why we can't trust clinical guidelines. BMJ 2013; 346: f3830.
10. Crane M. Physician frustration grows, income falls but a ray of hope. Medscape Business of Medicine. April 24, 2012. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/761870 Accessed February 4, 2014.
Review
For citations:
Samorodskaya I.V., Boitsov S.A. The recommendations review concerning the maintenance of patients with arterial hypertension: evidence and expert opinions. Systemic Hypertension. 2015;12(2):83-88. (In Russ.)
Views:
117
Email this article 